Our AI visibility checker measures both your AI readiness and your real-world AI visibility. It analyzes whether AI assistants can easily read and understand your content, then tests how often ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity actually cite your website when answering buyer questions.
Whether ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity are recommending them instead of competitors. The AI Visibility Checker was built to help companies understand and improve that visibility.
Two measurements, one report: your scores next to your competitors’, and a ranked list of fixes.
The first number is your AEO score (AI answer-readiness), from 0 to 100. The second is your AI visibility, a citation rate.
| Item | AEO score | AI visibility |
|---|---|---|
| What it measures | How easily AI assistants can find, read, understand and quote the page | How often ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity cite the page or site for buyer questions |
| How it’s measured | Checks of the page itself: crawler access, structured data, content, trust signals, Google PageSpeed | Real answers from the engines’ official APIs, several runs per question |
| Scale | 0 to 100 | A percentage, always shown with the number of answers behind it ("9%, 11 of 126") |
| What it tells you | What you can fix | Whether your fixes are turning into citations |
A page can score well on readiness and still be cited rarely, for example when competitors have stronger pages for the same questions. That’s why the report shows both, side by side with your competitors.
The AEO score combines five areas into a score from 0 to 100. Each area is made of individual checks, and each check is worth a share of the area’s points.
| Item | Weight | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Content answerability | 35% | Whether the page answers buyer questions directly: question-style headings, a direct answer at the start of each section, steps and comparisons in lists or tables, specific facts |
| Structured data | 25% | Whether JSON-LD schema (Organization, FAQ, Article, Product, Breadcrumb and others) is present, valid, has its required properties and matches what the page shows |
| Crawl access | 20% | Whether search engines and AI crawlers may read and index the page, whether the main content is in the HTML without JavaScript, whether answers may quote it, the canonical link, a direct 200 response, the sitemap and llms.txt |
| Technical health | 10% | Google PageSpeed Insights: performance, accessibility, best practices, SEO and agentic browsing |
| Trust signals | 10% | Whether it’s clear who is behind the page, whether a named, qualified person stands behind the content, whether claims are backed by sources, and whether the page shows it is up to date |
Content answerability carries the most weight because pages that answer buyer questions clearly and directly tend to be cited more often by AI assistants. These are starting weights: we check them against real citation results and adjust them when the data shows a better fit. Every report states the scoring version it used.
We run Google PageSpeed Insights on the page (mobile) and use the scores it shows, from 0 to 100. Each one is worth a set number of the AEO score’s 100 points.
| Item | Worth in the AEO score |
|---|---|
| Performance | 3.3 points |
| SEO | 2.2 points |
| Agentic browsing | 2.2 points |
| Accessibility | 1.1 points |
| Best practices | 1.1 points |
Core Web Vitals from real visitors are shown when Chrome has enough data for the page, but aren’t scored. Agentic browsing checks whether AI agents can browse and use the page; Google still marks it as under development, so it may change.
We suggest 15 questions a buyer is likely to ask, based on what the page offers, your industry and your location, and you can edit them. The free preview tests the first 3. Questions that name a brand are reported separately: AI visibility uses only the generic questions.
Each question goes to ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity through their official APIs, with web search turned on, so answers draw on the live web. The report lists the exact model version used for each engine.
AI assistants write each answer fresh, so the sources they cite change from run to run. We ask each question 3 times on each engine: 15 questions give 135 answers, and every result is a rate over those answers.
For every answer we record which websites it cites, then report your site citation rate, your page citation rate (ChatGPT and Perplexity, because Gemini names only the site), your share of voice across all citations, and rates by question and by engine.
We suggest up to 3 competitors (local, national or global) and you can change them. For each competitor we:
On the competitor’s page for the same offering (the report shows which page we used), so you see their AEO score and area scores next to yours. Technical health is measured for your page only.
In the same answers as yours, so the rates are directly comparable.
The checks they pass that your page doesn’t, with the points you’d gain by fixing each.
Every check that doesn’t pass becomes an issue with:
The action plan puts the issues in order: what to do next, then what to do when you can. Checks the page already passes are listed under "Already right", and anything we couldn’t check is listed with the reason.
On your page, and why it matters for AI assistants.
Often with ready-to-use code (such as schema markup) or draft content (such as question headings written from your page).
The AEO score points you’d gain, and whether it’s a quick fix (minutes) or some work (hours).
Who usually does it: web developer, content writer or marketing.
A page checked recently, by anyone, isn’t read again, and the results say how old they are ("Results from 3 hours ago"). Rescan checks everything fresh.
After you make fixes, AI citations usually take about 6 to 8 weeks to change, so rescan then to measure the difference.
ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, through their official APIs with web search turned on. Each report lists the exact model version used for each engine.
AI assistants generate each answer fresh, and the web pages they draw on change too. We reduce the noise by asking every question 3 times on each engine and reporting a rate, but some movement between scans is normal. Look for consistent changes across several questions.
A question that names your company almost always cites your own site, which would inflate the score. AI visibility uses only generic questions, the ones buyers ask before they know who you are; branded questions are shown separately.
Google rankings and AI citations are related, but they are not the same. AI assistants often cite sources that answer specific questions clearly, contain structured data, and provide trustworthy information. A page can rank well in search and still receive few AI citations, or vice versa.
Readiness removes the reasons AI assistants skip a page, but they still choose between pages. If competitors have pages that answer the same questions more directly, or are better known for the topic, they may be cited instead. The competitor comparison and the per-question results show where.
We store the page URLs you scan, the competitors and questions you choose, your report results, and your email address if you request a full report. Your email is the only personal information we collect; everything else is publicly available information about websites. See our privacy policy.
The free preview, with your AEO score and a 3-question test, needs no signup, and your first 3 full reports are free when you enter your email. After that, each additional report costs $19.99, or $79.99 for a pack of 5. See pricing.
Get your AEO score and AI visibility, compared with 3 competitors, in a few minutes.
Tell us what you want to build and we'll set up a free consultation.
We respond within two business days.
Our team will review it and get back to you within 2 business days.
Prefer to pick a time? Book a call with us
Need to talk sooner? Call us at (248) 268-2592 during Eastern Time business hours.